Innovation Ecosystem/Opinion
The noose keeps tightening
New reporting by Kait Justice and Ellie Leonard provide new revelations about Epstein’s involvement with Michael Wolff, the Saudis, and the alleged sex crimes of President Trump
By Richard Asinof
Posted 5/4/26
The story highlights excerpts from the reporting of Ellie Leonard and Kait Justice, two remarkable citizen journalists who have displayed tenacity, gumption, and great courage.
Would the Providence Journal be willing to serialize the reporting of Leonard and Justice on a weekly basis? Will Congress subpoena the Woolf tapes of his interviews with Epstein and Trump? Would Ronan Farrow, author of “Catch and Kill,” be willing to write a sequel with the new information made available through Leonard’s reporting?
Six decades ago, the birth of alternative weeklies was driven by changes in technology, the move from linotype printing to photo offset. In large part, the traditional dailies responded by adapting their newspapers to include the innovations of the alternative press.
With the advent of Substack, the innovations of social media and the Internet have been combined to reinvent reporting — away from the corporate hegemony. Its success is predicated on a refreshing honesty that is often lacking from our current news reporting.
With the advent of Substack, the innovations of social media and the Internet have been combined to reinvent reporting — away from the corporate hegemony. Its success is predicated on a refreshing honesty that is often lacking from our current news reporting.
PROVIDENCE — Ellie Leonard and Kait Justice continue to push ahead with their independent reporting, analyzing the content of hundreds of e-mails that provide hard facts about Epstein, his apparent involvement with foreign governments, including Saudi Arabia, and efforts by journalist Michael Wolff to try to “catch and kill” stories about Epstein's survivors. (See links below.)
Leonard transcribed and catalogued more than 1,800 emails between convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and journalist Michael Wolff, painting a damning portrait of Wolff’s efforts to undercut the stories of the survivors of Epstein’s sex crimes.
Justice, in turn, analyzed the apparent relationships between Epstein and foreign governments, including Saudi Arabia, painting a portrait of an espionage network at play.
Taken together, the reporting by Leonard and Justice makes for a remarkable narrative — one that seems to be consistently ignored by the mainstream news media across the country — and here in Rhode Island.
To help remedy that, here are two excerpts from the reporting by Leonard and Justice. Please feel free to share with friends and colleagues.
Ellie Leonard
Before Michael Wolff came to Substack in late October, 2025, I followed his writing religiously. The self-professed media “darling” claimed to know more about Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump than almost anyone, saying in multiple interviews that he had “upwards of 100 hours” of audio and video recordings with the notorious sex offender, in which Epstein was said to have given insider information about Donald Trump, his wife Melania, and the now-President’s comings and goings as a wealthy New York socialite with a sordid history.
My side-hustle small business is in transcription, so I wanted those interviews. They’re the holy grail of off-the-record information, and I didn’t care if it took me months and he didn’t pay me a dime, I wanted access to the innerworkings of a madman. (The “devil,” as Wolff now refers to Epstein.)
But as Wolff revamped his platform as an influencer, complete with sockless flats and Pioneer Woman-esque backdrops in his East Hampton home, something started to change. He came off as resistant, boasting, dishonest, and ultimately unwilling to let go of those 100 hours of interviews, no matter how many people asked, claiming that “nobody wanted them.”
And when Melania threatened to sue him over his claims that Epstein had introduced her to Trump, Wolff set up a GoFundMe, making over $830,000 to pay for his legal bills. But the lawsuit never happened, and be that as it may, Wolff made $13 million on his best-selling book, Fire and Fury—what did he need with a GoFundMe, backed by the nickels and dimes of middle-class subscribers?
In November, the first real set of Epstein files dropped, mostly from the Epstein 1953 Estate, his private trust. In it, we saw a glimpse into Epstein’s relationships with dignitaries, friends, academics, and journalists, namely Michael Wolff. Wolff has since described their interactions as “transactional” and an attempt for Epstein to shape the narrative through Wolff. But as I began to read, it quickly became clear who was shaping the narrative, and it wasn’t Epstein.
In January 2026, we got our biggest batch of files, over 3 million, including 1,830 hits for “from Michael Wolff.” It was the motherlode of information, when both men completely let their guard down, never assuming their interactions would be part of one of the biggest, and most controversial investigations in American history.
And so I dug in, completely invested in their off-the-record conversations that appeared to start in 2009. But I knew there would be more. In Wolff’s own words, he’d traveled on Epstein’s private plane in the early 2000s to attend a TED conference on the West Coast. At the time he’d noticed Epstein’s propensity for “very tall girls.” It’s notable that he has since changed his statement to “model-tall young women.” But either way, it didn’t bother Wolff enough to stray from the friendship, because in 2003 he attempted to facilitate the sale of New York Magazine to Epstein, Harvey Weinstein, Donny Deutsch, and Nelson Peltz. They would ultimately be outbid by billionaire banker, Bruce Wasserstein.
The emails begin in 2009, with large gaps including the entirety of 2010, and all conversation prior; inevitably missing from our portion of the files. But by 2011, Epstein was sending Wolff pairs of his favorite sneakers, cementing the basis of their friendship by mid-summer.
In June 2011, Wolff introduced Epstein to Ian Osborne, a young PR guy with connections, telling Epstein they could effectively wipe the internet of his sexual history in 3-9 months, including “a rejiggering of search results through SEO and strategic content creation and replacement.”
Over the next eight years, Wolff would add Ken Frydman, Matt Hiltzik, Oliver Lloyd, and Juleanna Glover to the PR team, working day and night to bring Epstein back into the fold of wealthy society and global leaders and strategists.
In 2017, the PR shifted to covering Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial, in hopes to “shape the story” in a more positive light.
But Wolff didn’t stop there, merely documenting the conversations as he claims. By November, Epstein was sending over financial proposals, asking Wolff if he wanted to work as his full-time documentarian, a ghostwriter perhaps. Wolff responds that he’s “allergic to all money discussions,” but the idea intrigued him, leading to their first on-tape interviews. By spring of 2019, Wolff was writing “counter-narratives” to the Miami Herald’s investigation into Epstein, which ultimately led to Epstein’s arrest.
But PR didn’t just mean building Epstein up; it meant discrediting any stories that came out about Epstein, his first trial, his financial dealings, and the long list of accusations from minor Jane Does. When the Daily Beast began investigating Epstein in the early 2010s, Wolff offered methods of “neutralizing” editor-in-chief Tina Brown, while discrediting senior investigative reporter, Wayne Barrett.
Leonard’s reporting continues
Over the course of their 20-year friendship, Wolff fed into Epstein’s argument, that he was innocent, that his buddy Woody Allen was framed, and that he simply liked a “rub-and-tug” from adult women every once in a while, and what’s the big deal? Meanwhile, Wolff enjoyed the intel, meeting Epstein’s bigger connections, and hobnobbing with New York’s wealthy elite.
With Epstein’s first trial in the rearview mirror, Wolff had no problem recommending a young “girl I know,” a graduate student from Columbia, to apply as Epstein’s new assistant.
And, when leaked information about Epstein hit the media, Wolff recommended he pay off his doorman, the likely leaker. And those Melania Transcripts? The stuff Epstein had on New York Times chairman “Pinch” Sulzberger?
Those conversations would be held offline, perhaps in 100 hours of recorded interviews. As Wolff bounced back and forth to the White House, gathering quotes from Donald Trump and the cabinet for his book Fire and Fury, Epstein added anecdotes, read drafts, and edited to his liking.
But the biggest and most beneficial connection to both men, with an equal hatred of the now-President of the United States, was Steve Bannon, whom Wolff referred to as “spectrumy” and unfocused, always late, and paranoid. And yet, more than Wolff, Bannon seemed to know the most and have the most concrete connections with Donald Trump’s inner circle. And thus Michael Wolff introduced Bannon and Epstein in October 2017, a friendship that would last until Epstein’s death.
Kait Justice
In the summer of 2016, in a moment when Donald Trump was still fighting for the Republican nomination, Jared Kushner was a real estate heir running a distressed office tower on Fifth Avenue, and Mohammed bin Salman was a deputy crown prince whose elevation to Crown Prince was still a year away, Jeffrey Epstein started writing to the Saudi Royal Court with a complete redesign of how the world’s largest oil producer would finance itself.
He told Raafat Alsabbagh, the senior adviser at the Royal Court, that Saudi Arabia was “held hostage by the US banking system,” and across roughly 14 months of correspondence he proposed five mechanisms for getting the kingdom out of that arrangement:
1. A parallel currency for internal use among Muslim nations that he called the sharia, modeled on the IMF Special Drawing Rights and backed by oil rather than dollars.
2. A sharia-compliant cryptocurrency built on the same system Bitcoin runs on, with Epstein telling the Royal Court he had spoken to “some of the founders of bitcoin who are very excited.”
3. The bond structured through Saudi Aramco rather than the kingdom, which would route the debt around the legal exposure created by the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, and a year and a half later the kingdom did issue its first international bond through Aramco.
4. A $100 billion option for China on a stake in Saudi Aramco, structured so that China would pay for it by handing over the United States Treasury bonds China was already holding, which would let the deal settle directly between Saudi Arabia and China, bypassing American banks, American currency, and the regulatory oversight that comes with both.
5. Qatar recognizing Israel as the diplomatic ground for a regional investment corridor between the Gulf states and Israel, with the first gesture of that corridor being Qatari money paying for Gaza’s electricity infrastructure.
Every one of those things seems to describe a system designed to operate around the United States rather than through it, and the way Epstein describes his work to the Royal Court is the way someone proposing an exit from the American financial order might describe it.
The Position
Two months before the American election, Epstein wrote to Aziza Alahmadi at the Royal Court and told her that the Podesta Group, registered as a Saudi foreign agent and run by the brother of the chairman of the Clinton campaign, was obsolete because “it is the social media that controls votes,” and what the kingdom needed in the next administration was someone young, digitally native, politically connected, and unbothered by the lobbying firms of the 1990s.
Two months before the American election, Epstein wrote to Aziza Alahmadi at the Royal Court and told her that the Podesta Group, registered as a Saudi foreign agent and run by the brother of the chairman of the Clinton campaign, was obsolete because “it is the social media that controls votes,” and what the kingdom needed in the next administration was someone young, digitally native, politically connected, and unbothered by the lobbying firms of the 1990s.
Six days before that election he flew to Riyadh on the invitation of the Royal Court, met Mohammed bin Salman on November 7, 2016, and a year later wrote MBS a letter that opened with the line “November 7 will mark one year since you and i met and laughed.”
Three days after the American election, with Donald Trump’s victory now in hand, Epstein sent a formal pitch to the Royal Court addressed to “His Excellency,” in which he proposed himself as Financial Confidant to Mohammed bin Salman with biweekly access to the Crown Prince, with zero compensation for the first year and the Prince to decide payment thereafter, and with a scope of oversight that included the Public Investment Fund, the central bank, and the royal purse.
The detail in that pitch that explains what the relationship really was is the zero compensation, because historical analysis of many major intelligence service across the twentieth century names the same model as the most durable form of asset relationship, which is the asset who refuses payment because their loyalty is presumed to be ideological, and Epstein, in his October 2017 letter directly to the Crown Prince, made the model explicit when he wrote: “I do not want any money from you or the kingdom.”
Are you intrigued?
I hope so. The problem, of course, is how would one ever discover these narratives? Where in Rhode Island news media would you find a reference?
It is frustrating that these two citizen journalists have done such excellent reporting, reporting that seems to get lost in the distractions of our everyday existence — buying groceries, doing laundry, performing at work, and communicating with family.
If you can, make the time to explore the reporting of Leonard and Justice on Substack, which includes a number of video interviews.
